This is reminiscent of the attack on Trump by the parents of a dead war hero.
READ: Father of U.S. war hero attacks Trump's comment at debate
It seems that using the deceased or disabled as political weapons is common practice among the "latte sipping coastals" and once again the spokes person for the political Establishment showed complete disregard for those less fortunate then them.
Kellyanne Conway Has Just One Question for Meryl Streep After She Acted Like a Crusader for the 'Disabled'
Tuesday, January 10, 2017
FOOL US ONCE, SHAME ON YOU - FOOL US TWICE SHAME ON US
The intelligence community has a track record for lying when it's in their (the political Establishment) best interest.
Once again Americans are being asked to go along and blindly accept that they are being told the truth about the how and why's Hillary Clinton (the Establishment) lost this election.
And, once again, Americans are being asked to trust without verification that the Russians are to blame for Hillary's loss and Trumps win.
The question remains, given what we know about the intelligence community and how the political Establishment operates, will it work this time?
Just as the first casualty of war is said to be the truth, the first casualty of the new Cold War is irony. Our most prominent journalists seem to have missed the Orwellian irony of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) asking Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper at Friday's Senate hearings if Julian Assange has any credibility. Assange has maintained that the hacked or leaked emails of Democratic Party officials did not come from the Russian government, or any other government.
As is well-known, Clapper lied to Congress about a serious violation of the constitutional rights of tens of millions of Americans. This lie is a crime for which he actually could have been prosecuted. In March 2013, Clapper falsely answered, "No, sir" to the question, "Does the NSA [National Security Association] collect any type of data at all on millions, or hundreds of millions of Americans?"
He later admitted that his answer was untrue.
Clapper lied again in Friday’s testimony, saying that Assange was "under indictment" for "a sexual crime." In fact, Assange has not been indicted for anything, and the government of Sweden has never even charged him with a crime. (He was initially questioned by Swedish police but allowed to leave the country.)
In reality, he is a political prisoner, and the United Nations Working Group on arbitrary detention has found that he has been arbitrarily detained since 2010 by the United Kingdom and Sweden, and ordered his release and compensation.
Intel agencies ask Americans to 'trust, don't verify' in new Cold War | TheHill
Once again Americans are being asked to go along and blindly accept that they are being told the truth about the how and why's Hillary Clinton (the Establishment) lost this election.
And, once again, Americans are being asked to trust without verification that the Russians are to blame for Hillary's loss and Trumps win.
The question remains, given what we know about the intelligence community and how the political Establishment operates, will it work this time?
Just as the first casualty of war is said to be the truth, the first casualty of the new Cold War is irony. Our most prominent journalists seem to have missed the Orwellian irony of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) asking Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper at Friday's Senate hearings if Julian Assange has any credibility. Assange has maintained that the hacked or leaked emails of Democratic Party officials did not come from the Russian government, or any other government.
As is well-known, Clapper lied to Congress about a serious violation of the constitutional rights of tens of millions of Americans. This lie is a crime for which he actually could have been prosecuted. In March 2013, Clapper falsely answered, "No, sir" to the question, "Does the NSA [National Security Association] collect any type of data at all on millions, or hundreds of millions of Americans?"
He later admitted that his answer was untrue.
Clapper lied again in Friday’s testimony, saying that Assange was "under indictment" for "a sexual crime." In fact, Assange has not been indicted for anything, and the government of Sweden has never even charged him with a crime. (He was initially questioned by Swedish police but allowed to leave the country.)
In reality, he is a political prisoner, and the United Nations Working Group on arbitrary detention has found that he has been arbitrarily detained since 2010 by the United Kingdom and Sweden, and ordered his release and compensation.
Intel agencies ask Americans to 'trust, don't verify' in new Cold War | TheHill
Sunday, January 8, 2017
LATTE SIPPING COASTALS USE GOLDEN GLOBES TO ATTACK TRUMP
It seems the Hollywood crowd can't get over their losses and are still taking every opportunity; even celebrity award shows, to turn these venues into Trump bashing events.
They continue to alienate themselves from Main Street Americans by behaving like spoiled children who throw tantrums when they don't get their way.
Donald Trump Derides “Hillary Lover” Meryl Streep’s Golden Globes Speech | Deadline
They continue to alienate themselves from Main Street Americans by behaving like spoiled children who throw tantrums when they don't get their way.
Donald Trump Derides “Hillary Lover” Meryl Streep’s Golden Globes Speech | Deadline
THE US POLITICAL ESTABLISHMENT BS TRAIN HAS LEFT THE STATION
And it's filled to the brim with hysterical, exaggerated fake news based on flimsy or non-existent information that defies common sense.
READ: Something About This Russia Story Stinks - Rolling Stone
Let's start with distinguishing the difference between "leaking" and "hacking"
READ: Emails were leaked, not hacked;
Based on the way this was handled by both the FBI and the DNC it would be reasonable to say that what we are talking about are "leaked" not "hacked" information
READ: The FBI Never Asked For Access To Hacked Computer Servers
Further, it appears that the DNC did not want to get to the truth
READ: FBI Claims DNC ‘Inhibited’ Its Investigation Of Stolen Emails
What Americans are left with is a huge pile of convoluted BS from which it is literally impossible to discover what really happened; leaving us to forever debate about what really happened
READ; US Report Still Lacks Proof on Russia ‘Hack’
READ: Something About This Russia Story Stinks - Rolling Stone
Let's start with distinguishing the difference between "leaking" and "hacking"
READ: Emails were leaked, not hacked;
Based on the way this was handled by both the FBI and the DNC it would be reasonable to say that what we are talking about are "leaked" not "hacked" information
READ: The FBI Never Asked For Access To Hacked Computer Servers
Further, it appears that the DNC did not want to get to the truth
READ: FBI Claims DNC ‘Inhibited’ Its Investigation Of Stolen Emails
What Americans are left with is a huge pile of convoluted BS from which it is literally impossible to discover what really happened; leaving us to forever debate about what really happened
READ; US Report Still Lacks Proof on Russia ‘Hack’
One thing we can be certain about is that the DNC and the Clinton Campaign were up to no good and were actively trying to manipulate and undermine the political process at every turn. As a result the American people lost faith in the system and selected an independent anti-Establishment "outsider" to be our next POTUS.
BERNIE HAS MESSAGE FOR LATTE SIPPING COASTALS
"I TOLD YOU SO"
As America continues to absorb the results of a truly contentious and historic presidential election, one group of voters may be particularly upset: Bernie Sanders supporters. For months over the course of the campaign, many in Sanders' ranks said he was the only candidate with a sure shot at beating Trump, that he could reach working class voters better than Hillary Clinton could, and that he offered a true progressive agenda that Clinton could not.
But these supporters never got the chance to be proven right — or wrong. So now, some of them vent.
"Schadenfreude," said Philip Werlau, a Bernie Sanders supporter, when asked his feelings about this week's election results. "That is the German word for taking pleasure in someone else's misfortune. ... Because I don't want Trump to be president. But I'm happy that what I perceived as unfair tactics lost."
Bernie Sanders Supporters Say He Could Have Beat Donald Trump : NPR
As America continues to absorb the results of a truly contentious and historic presidential election, one group of voters may be particularly upset: Bernie Sanders supporters. For months over the course of the campaign, many in Sanders' ranks said he was the only candidate with a sure shot at beating Trump, that he could reach working class voters better than Hillary Clinton could, and that he offered a true progressive agenda that Clinton could not.
But these supporters never got the chance to be proven right — or wrong. So now, some of them vent.
"Schadenfreude," said Philip Werlau, a Bernie Sanders supporter, when asked his feelings about this week's election results. "That is the German word for taking pleasure in someone else's misfortune. ... Because I don't want Trump to be president. But I'm happy that what I perceived as unfair tactics lost."
Bernie Sanders Supporters Say He Could Have Beat Donald Trump : NPR
Saturday, January 7, 2017
BERNIE SAYS IT WAS HILLARY NOT THE RUSSIANS
Bernie Sanders thinks he has a pretty good idea why Hillary Clinton and Democrats lost in the 2016 election.
"Look, you can't simply go around to wealthy people's homes raising money and expect to win elections," the Vermont senator, who gave Clinton a surprisingly strong run for the Democratic nomination, told NPR's David Greene in an interview airing on Morning Edition. "You've got to go out and mix it up and be with ordinary people."
That picks up on a criticism of Clinton devoting too much time to fundraising — and not enough to on-the-ground campaigning in traditionally Democratic states, like Michigan and Wisconsin. In the general election, Clinton never visited Wisconsin after she became the nominee and visited Michigan late in the game. The two Upper Midwestern states swung narrowly to Trump: Wisconsin by slightly more than 20,000 votes and Michigan by slightly more than 10,000. During the primary, Sanders boasted of his small-donor donations.
"The Democratic Party swallowed the bait," he argued. "They became hooked on big money."
Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders Says Democrats Are Not Doing A Good Job Reaching Out To Communities : NPR
"Look, you can't simply go around to wealthy people's homes raising money and expect to win elections," the Vermont senator, who gave Clinton a surprisingly strong run for the Democratic nomination, told NPR's David Greene in an interview airing on Morning Edition. "You've got to go out and mix it up and be with ordinary people."
That picks up on a criticism of Clinton devoting too much time to fundraising — and not enough to on-the-ground campaigning in traditionally Democratic states, like Michigan and Wisconsin. In the general election, Clinton never visited Wisconsin after she became the nominee and visited Michigan late in the game. The two Upper Midwestern states swung narrowly to Trump: Wisconsin by slightly more than 20,000 votes and Michigan by slightly more than 10,000. During the primary, Sanders boasted of his small-donor donations.
"The Democratic Party swallowed the bait," he argued. "They became hooked on big money."
Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders Says Democrats Are Not Doing A Good Job Reaching Out To Communities : NPR
IS THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY POLITICALLY CORRUPT?
The claim is that the Russians helped Trump win the election but it is not backed up with any factual or verifiable proof. The total report is nothing more than conjecture based on opinions of people; known and unknown who claim to be non-political.
It is also based on an assumption that Main Street Americans are gullible and stupid, and were duped by the Russians into voting for Trump; resulting in negating the electorate and denigrating Trump. How is that not political? How is that not shameful and corrupt?
Putin Ordered 'Influence Campaign' To Help Trump, U.S. Intelligence Report Says : The Two-Way : NPR
It is also based on an assumption that Main Street Americans are gullible and stupid, and were duped by the Russians into voting for Trump; resulting in negating the electorate and denigrating Trump. How is that not political? How is that not shameful and corrupt?
Putin Ordered 'Influence Campaign' To Help Trump, U.S. Intelligence Report Says : The Two-Way : NPR
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)