Saturday, April 14, 2018

DID THE FBI (COMEY) MEDDLE WITH THE US ELECTIONS?

They say that the FBI and the other Intelligence/Law Enforcment agencies are professional, ethical, and non-partisan in the way they operate.



As it turns out the ex-Director of the FBI tells a very different story.



ABC: Comey says his belief Clinton would win 2016 election 'was a factor' in email inquiry - CNNPolitics

Sunday, April 1, 2018

TAKING MONEY IN RETURN FOR SEX IS CALLED P----------N

Engaging in sex that involves money transaction(s) is called prostitution.

Sexual assault is a crime and accepting money to cover it up is considered both colluding with the perpetrator and obstruction of justice. The defense that these women were afraid, ashamed, etc. though understandable, does not excuse their behavior no more that the perpetrators using these sort of defenses to exonerate themselves.

Worse still it allows the perpetrators to not be held accountable or punished for their crimes and gives them the opportunity to continue doing it.

Many of the assaults could have been prevented had the women who took money to stay silent come forward instead.

Vladimir Putin Spokesman Likens Harvey Weinstein Accusers To “Prostitutes” | Deadline


A Moscow radio station is reporting that a spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin has likened actresses who claimed sexual abuse by former producer Harvey Weinstein to “prostitutes.”

Spokesman Dmitry Peskov made the remarks in an unofficial capacity while speaking to students in Moscow. The statement was part of an awkward defense in response to a question regarding a senior member of the Russian Parliament who has been accused of sexual harassment.

Leonid Slutsky, head of the foreign affairs committee in Parliament’s lower house, the State Duma, has been accused of making lewd sexual comments and groping by members of the Western media covering Russia.

Peskov has made no official comments on the Slutsky accusations but told students the women in the Slutsky case should have reported the offenses immediately. “If Slutsky attacked a poor journalist, where was she? Why did she put up with it?” he asked. “They got felt up in his office. Girls probably see better, but he can probably be seen as a not very pleasant man. If he felt you up, if he harassed you, why were you silent? Why did so much time pass and then you go to the ethics commission?

Monday, March 26, 2018

ARE TAXPAYERS FUNDING TRUMP BASHING ON PUBLIC MEDIA?

It appears that so-called "public broadcasting" media organizations are slowly going to a main stream media format which includes bashing POTUS. You can see that in the they select pundits and the commentary from their own in-house staff which is drastically slanted to present a negative view of Trump. It's a rare event if someone is interviewed that supports POTUS.

The idea behind "publicly funded" (taxpayer money) news is that it would be non-commercial, a-political, and balanced based on objectively reporting the news.

Sadly, those days are over and the public funding should also end.

Trump’s Budget Again Proposes Public TV, Arts Funding Elimination – Variety

Sunday, March 25, 2018

ATTENTION TRUMP-BASHERS; SEX IS NOT ILLEGAL OR AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE

It appears that Stormy was not just a porn star, but also a hooker.



Note; One night stands are not affairs.



Stormy Daniels Talks About Alleged Trump Affair On ’60 Minutes’ | Deadline

MAIN STREAM MEDIA GOES FULL TABLOID FORMAT

Porn stars and Playboy pin-ups are the prime time lineup for Main Stream Media outlets which is another sign that the industry has deteriorated into a dumping ground for hyped up "faux" news.

Someone should also point out to the audience of Trump bashers that sex is not illegal, nor an impeachable offense. 

Trump, first lady will be 1,000 miles apart when Stormy Daniels appears on ‘60 Minutes’ - The Washington Post

Thursday, March 22, 2018

20 REASONS WHY THE US GOES TO WAR; OURS OR OTHERS

20 Companies Profiting the Most From War - 24/7 Wall St.


The grim reality of civil wars in the Middle East, rising tensions between global powers, the spectre of international terrorism, and the increasing threat of cyberattacks are matters of grave concern for world leaders and citizens alike — and the lifeblood of some companies.

In the context of a seemingly ever-more dangerous world, revenue from arms and military services at the world’s 100 largest defense contractors totalled $374.8 billion in 2016, a 1.9% uptick from the previous year, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

Maintaining a cutting edge, state-of-the-art arsenal can act as a powerful deterrent against aggressors and can change the outcome of a conflict — and governments across the globe invest accordingly. Sales of defense contractor Lockheed Martin to the U.S. government alone totalled $35.2 billion in 2017, more than the annual budgets of many federal agencies — including the Department of the Interior and the Environmental Protection Agency.

24/7 Wall St. reviewed the 20 companies with the highest revenue from arms sales in 2016 based on the Top 100 Arms-Producing and Military Services Companies report from SIPRI. While the companies on this list span Russia and Western Europe, the United States is home to the vast majority of the largest defense contractors.

Click here to see the 20 companies profiting the most from war.